COMPARE & SWITCH / AGENTIC NETWORK OPERATIONS

CommandLink vs. Auvik

CommandLink vs. Auvik

AI investigates. CommandLink connects the rest.

Replace fragmented monitoring with AI agents that gather evidence and investigate issues. Connect the ticket work, keep your service desk, and add ISP, network and security services from the same partner.

Less manual investigation

Fewer disconnected tools

Software + services. One partner.

THE COMPARISON AT A GLANCE

What changes when
you choose CommandLink?

THE PUBLISHED APPROACH

THE PUBLISHED APPROACH

Auvik

Auvik

Published product capabilities.

Published product capabilities.

THE COMMANDLINK APPROACH

THE COMMANDLINK APPROACH

CommandLink

CommandLink

One platform. A connected operation.

One platform. A connected operation.

Cloud + collector

Cloud + collector

Network management with a cloud-connected collector

Stop piecing the incident together

Stop piecing the incident together

Bring monitoring, asset relationships and investigation into one working context.

AI troubleshooting

AI troubleshooting

Analyzes alerts and context, with evidence and next checks.

Put AI on the investigation

Put AI on the investigation

Agents gather evidence and run checks. Your engineers inspect the finding and direct the next step.

Network visibility

Network visibility

Discovery, mapping and monitoring for network teams.

Keep the work moving

Keep the work moving

CommandLink ITSM syncs ticket work to ServiceNow, Jira and more. Your team keeps its service desk.

TAKE THE COMPARISON BEYOND SOFTWARE

TAKE THE COMPARISON BEYOND SOFTWARE

ISP Connectivity. SD-WAN + SASE.
NOC + SOC services.

ISP Connectivity. SD-WAN + SASE.
NOC + SOC services.

Get the software and the team behind it from one partner. Choose self-managed, co-managed or pro-managed delivery, with the services your operation needs.

Get the software and the team behind it from one partner. Choose self-managed, co-managed or pro-managed delivery, with the services your operation needs.

Published vendor approaches, not a feature-absence checklist. Confirm capabilities and service responsibilities in your evaluation. Services are scoped in your proposal.

THE COMMANDLINK EXPERIENCE

THE COMMANDLINK EXPERIENCE

AI investigates.
Your team takes command.

AI investigates.
Your team takes command.

Watch the agent gather evidence and build a finding your engineers can inspect. Keep the investigation connected to the response.

Bring your own incident to the evaluation.

COMMAND|MONITOR

AGENT / INVESTIGATION

AI follows the evidence.

Working assessment

AI INVESTIGATION

The evidence points upstream.

Loss and interface errors align. Local switching remains healthy.

AI INVESTIGATION

The evidence points upstream.

Loss and interface errors align. Local switching remains healthy.

01

Query interface metrics

Evidence attached

02

Run active network checks

Results attached

03

Assess related events

Finding assembled

Operator direction

“Check the adjacent circuit.”

COMPARE THE OPERATING APPROACH

Auvik and CommandLink.
Know what you are choosing.

Start with the published approach, then test the workflow and coverage your team needs.

SCROLL

Decision

Auvik · published approach

CommandLink · why make the move

Network visibility

Provides network discovery, mapping and monitoring. [1]

Validate device health, interfaces and location/service context against the network you operate.

Deployment

Uses a lightweight collector connected to its cloud service. [1]

Evaluate public checks, vendor APIs and behind-firewall collection; private networks can still require collectors.

AI investigation

Its AI Troubleshooting Agent analyzes alerts and network context, presents evidence and recommends next checks. [2]

Demonstrate agent tools, active checks, inspectable findings, operational memory and human direction in one incident.

Decision scope

A network-management platform with its own AI capabilities. [1]

Compare the complete CommandLink workflow, including alerting and connected ITSM, against the tools your team uses together.

Sources and comparison scope · reviewed October 9, 2026

Sources and comparison scope · reviewed Oct. 9, 2026

Why make the move

A clear network map is the beginning. Get the investigation and response too.

If your network view is clear but the next steps still cross three tools and two teams, the work is fragmented. Choose CommandLink to connect monitoring, AI investigation, alerting and ticket work, with network and security service options behind it.

Connect visibility to investigation

Relate device and interface signals to locations and services, then let the agent investigate the evidence.

Bring knowledge into the work

Capture equipment constraints and operator feedback in scoped memory. Reduce the context the next engineer has to reconstruct.

Connect
the response

Command|Monitor creates CommandLink ITSM tickets. Existing integrations sync the work to ServiceNow, Jira and other supported platforms.

Software and the services behind the network

One partner for the platform and the operation.

CommandLink combines agentic software with ISP Connectivity, deep SD-WAN and SASE integrations, and NOC and SOC services. Choose self-managed, co-managed or pro-managed delivery around your team.

ISP Connectivity

Bring ISP services and Internet Aggregation into the same CommandLink relationship as monitoring and operations.

SD-WAN + SASE

Connect supported SD-WAN and SASE platforms to network and service context through deep integrations.

NOC + SOC services

Add operational and security services alongside the platform. Define responsibilities, coverage and escalation in your service scope.

See the CommandLink workflow

From network signals to AI investigation to ticket work.

Connect data and relationships, let agents investigate, and keep the response attached to the findings. Work directly in CommandLink or retain your supported service desk.

Search Demo Company - Command|Link...

Command|Link

3

operator

Alert Spike - WAN Edge Service

Investigation

Nov 5, 2026, 5:04 PM

3

Summary

AI

The alert spike originates from core-router-01 losing its BGP peer at 14:29 UTC. This caused OSPF adjacency failures that cascaded through the WAN Edge service, impacting 5 downstream dependencies.

Services impacted

5

Critical alerts

47

Avg latency

23ms

Throughput

640 Mbps

Findings

AI

Critical

Root cause: BGP peer failure on core-router-01

AI

BGP hold timer expired for peer 10.0.1.1 at 14:29 UTC. This is the earliest event in the cascade and directly caused OSPF adjacency loss. Recommend checking physical link to upstream provider and reviewing BGP keepalive settings.

Warning

Secondary: Possible exploit attempt during outage

AI

IPS flagged CVE-2024-3400 from 203.0.113.42 at 14:31 UTC — 2 minutes after the BGP failure. Attackers commonly probe during routing disruptions. Recommend blocking source IP and reviewing firewall logs for lateral movement.

Ask a follow-up, request deeper analysis, or suggest a hypothesis...

Summary

Components

(8)

Discuss

(3)

Private

Visible to everyone on this investigation

2 open

Command|Intel

6 minutes ago

I've flagged the CVE-2024-3400 exploit attempt as potentially related. Want me to dig deeper into the firewall logs for this source IP?

You

6 minutes ago

Yes — also check if that IP appears in any other event sources in the last 24h

Command|Intel

6 minutes ago

Checked — 203.0.113.42 appears in 3 additional firewall log entries over the past 12h, all port scans on 443/tcp. No lateral movement detected.

Reply... (use @ai)

You

6 minutes ago

Is there a redundant path through fw-edge-west? We should have a failover route configured.

Command|Intel

6 minutes ago

fw-edge-west is online and healthy, but no ECMP or failover route is configured for the BGP peer that failed. The OSPF adjacency to fw-edge-west is intact — this could be a quick mitigation path.

You

5 minutes ago

Confirmed with NOC — the upstream provider had a fibre cut at 14:28. ETA for repair is 2h.

Start a discussion... (or @ai to invoke AI)

Search Demo Company - Command|Link...

Command|Link

3

operator

Alert Spike - WAN Edge Service

Investigation

Nov 5, 2026, 5:04 PM

3

Summary

AI

The alert spike originates from core-router-01 losing its BGP peer at 14:29 UTC. This caused OSPF adjacency failures that cascaded through the WAN Edge service, impacting 5 downstream dependencies.

Services impacted

5

Critical alerts

47

Avg latency

23ms

Throughput

640 Mbps

Findings

AI

Critical

Root cause: BGP peer failure on core-router-01

AI

BGP hold timer expired for peer 10.0.1.1 at 14:29 UTC. This is the earliest event in the cascade and directly caused OSPF adjacency loss. Recommend checking physical link to upstream provider and reviewing BGP keepalive settings.

Warning

Secondary: Possible exploit attempt during outage

AI

IPS flagged CVE-2024-3400 from 203.0.113.42 at 14:31 UTC — 2 minutes after the BGP failure. Attackers commonly probe during routing disruptions. Recommend blocking source IP and reviewing firewall logs for lateral movement.

Ask a follow-up, request deeper analysis, or suggest a hypothesis...

Summary

Components

(8)

Discuss

(3)

Private

Visible to everyone on this investigation

2 open

Command|Intel

6 minutes ago

I've flagged the CVE-2024-3400 exploit attempt as potentially related. Want me to dig deeper into the firewall logs for this source IP?

You

6 minutes ago

Yes — also check if that IP appears in any other event sources in the last 24h

Command|Intel

6 minutes ago

Checked — 203.0.113.42 appears in 3 additional firewall log entries over the past 12h, all port scans on 443/tcp. No lateral movement detected.

Reply... (use @ai)

You

6 minutes ago

Is there a redundant path through fw-edge-west? We should have a failover route configured.

Command|Intel

6 minutes ago

fw-edge-west is online and healthy, but no ECMP or failover route is configured for the BGP peer that failed. The OSPF adjacency to fw-edge-west is intact — this could be a quick mitigation path.

You

5 minutes ago

Confirmed with NOC — the upstream provider had a fibre cut at 14:28. ETA for repair is 2h.

Start a discussion... (or @ai to invoke AI)

Search Demo Company - Command|Link...

Command|Link

3

operator

Alert Spike - WAN Edge Service

Investigation

Nov 5, 2026, 5:04 PM

3

Summary

AI

The alert spike originates from core-router-01 losing its BGP peer at 14:29 UTC. This caused OSPF adjacency failures that cascaded through the WAN Edge service, impacting 5 downstream dependencies.

Services impacted

5

Critical alerts

47

Avg latency

23ms

Throughput

640 Mbps

Findings

AI

Critical

Root cause: BGP peer failure on core-router-01

AI

BGP hold timer expired for peer 10.0.1.1 at 14:29 UTC. This is the earliest event in the cascade and directly caused OSPF adjacency loss. Recommend checking physical link to upstream provider and reviewing BGP keepalive settings.

Warning

Secondary: Possible exploit attempt during outage

AI

IPS flagged CVE-2024-3400 from 203.0.113.42 at 14:31 UTC — 2 minutes after the BGP failure. Attackers commonly probe during routing disruptions. Recommend blocking source IP and reviewing firewall logs for lateral movement.

Ask a follow-up, request deeper analysis, or suggest a hypothesis...

Summary

Components

(8)

Discuss

(3)

Private

Visible to everyone on this investigation

2 open

Command|Intel

6 minutes ago

I've flagged the CVE-2024-3400 exploit attempt as potentially related. Want me to dig deeper into the firewall logs for this source IP?

You

6 minutes ago

Yes — also check if that IP appears in any other event sources in the last 24h

Command|Intel

6 minutes ago

Checked — 203.0.113.42 appears in 3 additional firewall log entries over the past 12h, all port scans on 443/tcp. No lateral movement detected.

Reply... (use @ai)

You

6 minutes ago

Is there a redundant path through fw-edge-west? We should have a failover route configured.

Command|Intel

6 minutes ago

fw-edge-west is online and healthy, but no ECMP or failover route is configured for the BGP peer that failed. The OSPF adjacency to fw-edge-west is intact — this could be a quick mitigation path.

You

5 minutes ago

Confirmed with NOC — the upstream provider had a fibre cut at 14:28. ETA for repair is 2h.

Start a discussion... (or @ai to invoke AI)

Connected network context

Bring supported telemetry, devices, locations and services into the investigation.

Inspectable AI work

Agents query metrics and logs, run checks and assemble evidence. Engineers review and direct the work.

Connected ticket work

Command|Monitor creates CommandLink ITSM tickets. Existing integrations sync the work to ServiceNow, Jira and other supported ITSM platforms.

A practical switching plan

Prove the replacement. Then retire the overlap.

Keep the existing workflow available while you validate a representative scope. Move the critical functions with clear owners and acceptance criteria.

01 | Map

Inventory the functions, tools and records you rely on. Include dependencies outside the network team.

02 | Prove

Compare coverage, actionable alerts, evidence quality, manual handoffs and ticket sync using real workflows.

03 | Switch

Cut over in stages, preserve required history and retire the tools and infrastructure you have replaced.

CONSOLIDATE THE OPERATION

The AI platform.
The network services.
The operating team.

One CommandLink relationship can bring together the software and the services your network depends on.

COMMANDLINK

AI-native software + connected ITSM

Monitor → Investigate → Coordinate → Respond

ISP Connectivity

Internet Aggregation

SD-WAN + SASE

Deep platform integrations

NOC services

Network operations

SOC services

Security operations

ISP Connectivity

Internet Aggregation

NOC services

Network operations

SD-WAN + SASE

Deep platform integrations

SOC services

Security operations

YOUR CHOICE

Self-managed · Co-managed · Pro-managed

Portfolio and delivery options. Included services, coverage and responsibilities are defined in your proposal.

PLAN YOUR MOVE FROM AUVIK

Make your next incident
work differently.

Bring a recent incident. See the AI investigate, follow the connected ticket work and identify the tools you can retire. Leave with a concrete plan to move to CommandLink.

Opens CommandLink’s scheduling page. Include Auvik and your evaluation goals in the booking notes.

Bring these to the discussion

Bring these to the discussion

  • Devices, sites and required network checks

  • Mapping, configuration-management and remote-access needs

  • Current alerting, ticketing and investigation workflows

  • Your billable inventory and one recent network incident

  • ISP, SD-WAN/SASE, NOC/SOC needs and preferred management model

EXPLORE YOUR OPTIONS

EXPLORE YOUR OPTIONS

A few good questions

Get clear
on the details.

Why switch if Auvik already has AI?

Can we keep ServiceNow or Jira?

Will our network-management features carry over?

Will CommandLink be cheaper?

Your next operational advantage

Put AI to work.
Leave the sprawl behind.

Bring your stack and a recent incident.
See what your team can simplify.